📘 Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 (BSA)


🔹 Where BSA Applies

  • All Judicial Proceedings in or before any Court

  • Civil and Criminal trials (in courts of law)

  • Proceedings before tribunals if declared as courts by statute

  • Oral evidence → statements made in court by witnesses

  • Documentary evidence → documents produced for court’s inspection

🔹 Where BSA Does NOT Apply

  • Affidavits presented to any Court or officer

    • Even if notarized, it’s not “evidence” unless statute allows

    • ✔️ Acceptable only if CPC, CrPC, or a Special Act permits

  • Arbitration proceedings

  • Conciliation / mediation / Lok Adalat proceedings (not judicial)

  • Statements made outside court (unless admitted through exceptions like dying declaration, admissions, etc.)

🔹 Statutory Exceptions (When Affidavit = Evidence)

  • Civil Procedure Code (Order XIX) → Court may accept affidavit instead of oral evidence

  • Election Petitions → Affidavits required

  • Company Law Tribunals (NCLT/NCLAT) → Affidavits accepted

  • Family Courts → Certain proceedings through affidavit

⚖️ Case law: Sudha Devi v. M.P. Narayanan (1988) affidavit is not “evidence” under Evidence Act (now BSA) unless statute specifically provides.

Summary:
BSA governs evidence in judicial proceedings, but it excludes affidavits and arbitration unless a statute or CPC/CrPC specifically brings them in.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

🏛️ Court Fee Refund after Settlement: Rajasthan High Court Clears the Air

Bombay Court Ruling: Sending Obscene WhatsApp Messages Is a Serious Criminal Offence